Skip to main content

...My First Parable

Two men were walking through a deep forest in search of the large city they had heard was nearby. At a fork in the path, they spotted an ancient signpost with one end pointing toward each path.  

The first man noted the age of the signpost, the conflicting pointers, and the obvious attempts that had been made to either fix it or attach other messages onto it. Disgusted, he continued in the path that continued mostly in the direction he was already traveling.

The second man thought to himself: "Clearly this signpost was put here for a reason." He examined the post in depth, not looking for imperfections in it like the first man did, but for what information he could still get from it. He saw that the writing on it was faded but still readable with some effort. And the path to the large city was not the one the first man took, but the other one that required a sharp turn in the direction of travel. So, looking to get out of the forest while there was still daylight, he raced down the path given by the signpost.

That path took many twists and turns, but exited the forest just as the sun was setting. He found himself on a cliff overlooking a bay, where a boat sat, abandoned but still usable. He also saw a telescope mounted there, but no sign of the city. He decided to make camp for the night on that cliff. 

When he was done, he decided to look through the telescope. He found another path out of the forest, and a large encampment had been set up on both sides of it. The markings on the tents were those of a known bandit group that liked to ambush travelers and they were clearly setting up an ambush for someone. He then turned his attention across the bay, where the lights of the city started appearing. He then knew that, even though his journey was still going, he had found his destination.

The problem I have seem with too many discussions about religion and other metaphysical matters is that everyone is too busy examining the signposts for errors instead of for guidance on what it is pointing toward. Religious texts, properly so called, are designed to point to the deity they promote, not to themselves. A book that is concerned about itself is not doing its job. 


Some will question me on this view because it conflicts with their idea of Biblical inerrancy. But this, to me, is the main point of the Bible. The Bible inerrantly points to the true Word of God, namely Jesus. It is not the Word of God itself, but rather a pointer to Jesus. Jesus saves; the Bible tells us how to get to him. So those who focus on the differences in translations or versions or verses that were added or removed are missing the point. Does the Bible you are looking at point you to Jesus? If so, it is doing its job. If not, find one that does. 

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

 ...Walking through Spell Design I would like to take this time to walk through the how the Torg Eternity spell design looks today with examples of how current spells would appear as "on the fly" designs with explanations of the entries. To recall, an "on the fly" spell design takes the important aspects of the spell and divides them among the four magic skills. Each one would then be put into a Dramatic Skill Resolution and played out. When doing deliberate spell design, the process is done in a controlled setting over time, so each step would have effectively unlimited attempts at them. But what a deliberate spell design wants to do is create a new spell to add to the caster's repertoire, and what it values is balancing the amount of time spent working on the design with the final Difficulty Number of the spell. So a casting effectively repeats all the steps into one casting action, so counts as a Multi-Action on the four skills using the main skill for that s...
Post a Comment
Read more
 ..."Looking At" vs. "Looking Along" C. S, Lewis wrote many things in an attempt to explain Christianity as he knew it. One such writing was an essay called. "Mediation in a Toolshed" for which  an excellent video  has been made. It highlights an imbalance in our thinking that has only gotten worse over time. The essay begins by noticing that while in a dark toolshed, a sunbeam had through a crack at the top of the door. He was able to see the beam, with dust floating in it, and it seemed to be the only thing there. But when he stepped into it, all that vanished and he saw outside the leaves, the sky, and the sun that had produced the beam.  The first observation was him looking at  the beam, while the second observation was him looking along  the beam. One gives an outside account, while the other gives the inside participatory account. Other examples he gave are the person falling in love vs. a scientist measuring the physical reactions of the lover, o...
Post a Comment
Read more
 ...Spell Trappings, Part 2 This post is the conclusion of Spell Trappings, which was published just before this. Prerequisite A spell that requires another spell or Clearance Level to learn qualifies for the trapping of Prerequisite, The difficulty of obtaining the prerequisite determines the degree of Difficulty Number reduction. Restriction Most spells can be cast over and over. When one Fireball  ends, another can begin. Spells that place limits on how often they can be cast qualify for the Restriction trapping. A Restriction's value in reducing the Difficulty Number is based on the amount of time that must pass between castings. Self In the original Torg, there was a trapping for Touch. In that version, an unarmed combat  or similar test needed to be made to transfer the spell effect to the target. Torg Eternity 's Aysle Sourcebook specifies that Touch spells do not actually need to touch the target; merely being close enough to touch the target is good enough. So in...
Post a Comment
Read more