Skip to main content

 ...Extended Skill Tests in Torg Eternity

I have recently subscribed to Mike Mearls' Patreon account as a free member. There he is currently discussing how The World's Most Arrogant Role Playing Game needs an overhaul on its skill resolution system. In this, he incorporates tiered success, which is already familiar to Torg Eternity players, and includes in it the idea of a small failure being a Complication, which doesn't totally derail the action but introduces a new twist (again, familiar territory for those gamemasters who use Failing results). But his latest article (dated 2/14/2024) introduced a new idea, what I am calling an Extended Skill Test.

An Extended Skill Test heightens the excitement by extending the action over several rounds, giving players more opportunities to manage the encounter. In that aspect, it is similar to a Dramatic Skill Resolution. But unlike DSR, the EST is not forced into a four (or fewer) step format where certain steps are only available when the Drama Card allows them. Also, an EST is primarily focused on the same skills each time, but allows the ebb and flow of the Conflict Lines to influence the exact course of action.

Let's use the same example Mike did for this first run through (he promises more in later installments). The party finds themselves on a narrow beach at the base of a cliff 20 meters tall. They are here to infiltrate a pirate camp at the top of the cliff, and three pirates are assigned to watch the beach for intruders, but due to boredom, they are not very alert. The pirates have a rope ladder they use to get to and from the beach, but it is currently pulled up and unusable to the Storm Knights. 

The main thrust of the encounter is that the Storm Knights need to climb with stealth. This is resolved mechanically as tests on climbing and stealth, which could be done separately or as a Multi-Action, but the stealth part could be considered a contest if the pirates are alert. But with Success Levels, we have the tools to represent the players who are good at stealth setting up distractions to cover for the mistakes of those who are not. Furthermore, since base climbing speed is 1-3 meters per round depending on the success level of the climb, this will clearly take some time, thus making it perfect for an Extended Skill Test.

I would then work it like this: Each card flip will represent one minute of stealthy climbing instead of one round. Since the goal is to be stealthy, we only count five rounds of climbing instead of six in that minute and assume a successful Climbing Test earns 5 meters. We can apply the x2 for Good and x3 for Outstanding as normal for climbing, or we can be creative and say that the actual difference between the action total and the difficulty number translates into extra meters of climbing that minute. So succeeding by 4 on the climb would result in 9 meters advanced. 

To handle the stealth part, we count the success levels: Standard =1, Good =2, and Outstanding =3. A failure would be zero success levels, and a Mishap would take away a Success Level. Each round, the party needs one Success Level per climber to avoid detection. This allows the ones who are good at stealth to rack up Success Levels to cover for those who are not as stealthy. 

Adding in the result of the Drama Card and Conflict Lines is also simple enough. Results generally have mechanical effects that apply normally, but they can also have flavor justifications as well. Fatigue on the first round could be the result of a wave that crashes into the party before they get a chance to begin the climb and escape. The players might get an Up which represents an root network jutting out of the cliff, making that portion easier. 

If the party is detected, the action goes into combat rounds. If people make it up the cliff successfully, they can either continue into the camp itself, or they can stay and try to help the others up. A test could be made to stealthily toss the rope bridge down to help, for example. A distraction to get the pirates to look away from the beach might happen, reducing or eliminating the need for the rest of the group to be stealthy. Regardless, this is a more fun way of handling the encounter, which is what we want.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

 ...Walking through Spell Design I would like to take this time to walk through the how the Torg Eternity spell design looks today with examples of how current spells would appear as "on the fly" designs with explanations of the entries. To recall, an "on the fly" spell design takes the important aspects of the spell and divides them among the four magic skills. Each one would then be put into a Dramatic Skill Resolution and played out. When doing deliberate spell design, the process is done in a controlled setting over time, so each step would have effectively unlimited attempts at them. But what a deliberate spell design wants to do is create a new spell to add to the caster's repertoire, and what it values is balancing the amount of time spent working on the design with the final Difficulty Number of the spell. So a casting effectively repeats all the steps into one casting action, so counts as a Multi-Action on the four skills using the main skill for that s...
 ..."Looking At" vs. "Looking Along" C. S, Lewis wrote many things in an attempt to explain Christianity as he knew it. One such writing was an essay called. "Mediation in a Toolshed" for which  an excellent video  has been made. It highlights an imbalance in our thinking that has only gotten worse over time. The essay begins by noticing that while in a dark toolshed, a sunbeam had through a crack at the top of the door. He was able to see the beam, with dust floating in it, and it seemed to be the only thing there. But when he stepped into it, all that vanished and he saw outside the leaves, the sky, and the sun that had produced the beam.  The first observation was him looking at  the beam, while the second observation was him looking along  the beam. One gives an outside account, while the other gives the inside participatory account. Other examples he gave are the person falling in love vs. a scientist measuring the physical reactions of the lover, o...
 ...Spell Trappings, Part 2 This post is the conclusion of Spell Trappings, which was published just before this. Prerequisite A spell that requires another spell or Clearance Level to learn qualifies for the trapping of Prerequisite, The difficulty of obtaining the prerequisite determines the degree of Difficulty Number reduction. Restriction Most spells can be cast over and over. When one Fireball  ends, another can begin. Spells that place limits on how often they can be cast qualify for the Restriction trapping. A Restriction's value in reducing the Difficulty Number is based on the amount of time that must pass between castings. Self In the original Torg, there was a trapping for Touch. In that version, an unarmed combat  or similar test needed to be made to transfer the spell effect to the target. Torg Eternity 's Aysle Sourcebook specifies that Touch spells do not actually need to touch the target; merely being close enough to touch the target is good enough. So in...