Skip to main content

...Removing the Money from Politics

On this Leap Day, the United States is in the midst of spending billions of dollars to decide who runs this country for the next four years. Needless to say, this is a big business. However, the power that comes with being in charge is even bigger business, so those who put the billions in are doing it to make tens or hundreds of times as much. 

What people see is the initial movement of this political process. They see that some group hires a lobbyist who spends their money to get a politician elected, who then passes (or blocks) legislation to help the lobbyists' causes. This makes the politician worth supporting further, which perpetuates the cycle. 

So what do we do about it? After all, we seem to have the proverbial perpetual motion machine here: The money from the lobbyist passes to the politician, who then uses the government to refill the spigot of the cause who hired the lobbyist in the first place. But the key to all this motion is money: remove the money and the machine grinds to a halt.

Here, there are two sources of money. The lobbyist is getting money from some source, such as a corporation or group of corporations, which could be private, but also could be a public sector entity as well. But then the government generates money through taxes and borrowing and that money is what the other money is chasing. Money does not want to stay in one place; it wants to move so the rest of the economy can move freely: goods, services, discoveries, and knowledge. 

Since money wants to chase bigger money, it will go where it can catch the biggest money. There was an old saying: "Build a better mousetrap, and the world will beat a path to your door." This means that if you have something that is clearly better than the alternatives, those who need it will gladly pay to get it. And for the majority of United States history, that was the big money option. Trains and cars replaced horses; calculators replaced hand-done arithmetic, only to be replaces largely by computers, search engines, smartphones, and now it appears artificial intelligence may replace these. 

But nowadays, if you don't have the best product, that no longer means you are going to be replaced. Instead, you can legislate yourself into a better position if you have enough politicians on your side.  Who cares if you can't provide your service as well as your competitor if your competitor's methods are declared illegal? What does it matter if you overcharge for your services if no one else can provide it by law? And what do you care about what the customer wants when you aren't being paid by them as much as you are getting in a government subsidy to exist? And who is going to solve a problem if the government pays you to do something as opposed to the right thing? 

All these go to show that the biggest money currently is government. This is why we see so much money in politics. But this depends on government being able to make such pronouncements as winners and losers. If government is too limited to do that, it no longer becomes the biggest money source, and the corporations have to find new ways to chase after money, things like actually helping their customers. With this, the conclusion becomes clear: If you want to take the money out of politics, take the politics out of money,

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

 ...Spell Trappings, Part 2 This post is the conclusion of Spell Trappings, which was published just before this. Prerequisite A spell that requires another spell or Clearance Level to learn qualifies for the trapping of Prerequisite, The difficulty of obtaining the prerequisite determines the degree of Difficulty Number reduction. Restriction Most spells can be cast over and over. When one Fireball  ends, another can begin. Spells that place limits on how often they can be cast qualify for the Restriction trapping. A Restriction's value in reducing the Difficulty Number is based on the amount of time that must pass between castings. Self In the original Torg, there was a trapping for Touch. In that version, an unarmed combat  or similar test needed to be made to transfer the spell effect to the target. Torg Eternity 's Aysle Sourcebook specifies that Touch spells do not actually need to touch the target; merely being close enough to touch the target is good enough. So in...
Post a Comment
Read more
...Spell Trappings, Part 1 In a previous article, I mentioned that spells can have trappings , additional conditions that can reduce the Difficulty Number of a designed spell. Each trapping must create a situation where the spell either cannot be cast, provides incentive against casting, limits the scope of the spell, or requires additional preparation to cast.  This will list the trappings I have identified so far. Most of these are from the Aysle Sourcebook and reprinted in  Pixaud's Practical Grimoire  from the original Torg, but new ones are added, and all of them will offer suggestions for the player and game master to adjudicate them. In most cases, the value of the trapping has yet to be determined; I am "redesigning" the current published spells to see what values make sense. Additional Cast Time This one is easy enough to understand. Most spells can be cast in a single action, which is one round except in the case of Flurry. So if the spell takes longer than...
Post a Comment
Read more
 ...Tonight's Season Premiere of Survivor Every season of Survivor  (USA) is quite different. There are twists and turns, and the producers try to introduce new things to keep people on their toes. But the main difference each season is the contestants and how they interact with one another. I have seen the early interviews of each contestant prior to this first episode, and it's obvious that the producers cast the most unique cast of at least the modern (i.e. post-pandemic) era, and quite possibly of all time. Each has a unique path for what made them apply in the first place, and now they are being thrown together to see what's up. I will not name names, but here is a sample of some of who we have playing: A man whose house was raided by police at a very young age and realized at that moment that he might have rely on himself to survive. A man whose family encouraged him to apply but is so convinced he's going to be the first person voted out that they're throwing...
Post a Comment
Read more