Skip to main content

...Considerations of Spell Design in Torg Eternity

 Torg Eternity is Ulisses Spiele's reboot and simplification of Torg: Roleplaying the Possibility Wars from West End Games' original design. In the original, the magical world called Aysle had as part of its sourcebook a spell design system which applied a formula to how to design spells from their components.

To say that player reaction was mixed about this system would be a gross understatement. It was one of the most polarizing aspects I have ever seen in a game: players either loved and embraced it or they hated it with the fury of a thousand suns, with very few in-between reactions. Those who hated it (the majority of players were in this camp) did so because it was overly detailed, cumbersome, and too swingy to be reliable. But then again those who loved it did so for the exact same reasons. And since I as a gamemaster always had one player (and sometimes as many as three players at once) who loved the system and were trying to abuse it, I had to learn it better than they ever could.

So now here we are at the reboot, and to no one's real surprise, the spell design system is gone. Not only is it gone, the initial spell designs were intentionally made with no attempt to put them into a systemized format. Although the basic skill requirement was meant to be consistent in most cases, determining things like the range of a spell, its overall effects (including bonus effects for better casting), the base difficulty of a spell, and so on were all done ad hoc based on the "rule of cool". And for the sake of simplicity, that's a reasonable place to start.

But now we have done the "Year One" cosm books for all the invading cosms, and are moving on to Year Two, where the High Lords are no longer as tolerant of one another and the cosms are beginning to interfere not just with Core Earth's plans, but each others as well. The good thing about building spells ad hoc is that you can tailor the design to the world as it currently exists. The bad part about it is that you must take everything else into account with each spell design. This has the unfortunate drawback where each spell consumes not just design space for itself, but takes extra nibbles into the overall design pool as every future design must work with the current one in mind. 

Nonetheless, I am determined to figure something out. My first goal is to design a base system for "on the fly " The goal is to have a limited set of spells that are usable in round play where each component is build into one of the four steps of a Dramatic Skill Resolution. From there, a universal system based off the considerations outlined can be created for more advanced designs. When complete, the goal is to have a system that makes all the current spell designs possible, with those that got extra benefits from the “rule of cool” possible but rare or costly in some other form. But to do that, I need to study the vast array of what is already designed to learn the baseline. Please be patient; this may take a while.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

 ...Walking through Spell Design I would like to take this time to walk through the how the Torg Eternity spell design looks today with examples of how current spells would appear as "on the fly" designs with explanations of the entries. To recall, an "on the fly" spell design takes the important aspects of the spell and divides them among the four magic skills. Each one would then be put into a Dramatic Skill Resolution and played out. When doing deliberate spell design, the process is done in a controlled setting over time, so each step would have effectively unlimited attempts at them. But what a deliberate spell design wants to do is create a new spell to add to the caster's repertoire, and what it values is balancing the amount of time spent working on the design with the final Difficulty Number of the spell. So a casting effectively repeats all the steps into one casting action, so counts as a Multi-Action on the four skills using the main skill for that s...
 ..."Looking At" vs. "Looking Along" C. S, Lewis wrote many things in an attempt to explain Christianity as he knew it. One such writing was an essay called. "Mediation in a Toolshed" for which  an excellent video  has been made. It highlights an imbalance in our thinking that has only gotten worse over time. The essay begins by noticing that while in a dark toolshed, a sunbeam had through a crack at the top of the door. He was able to see the beam, with dust floating in it, and it seemed to be the only thing there. But when he stepped into it, all that vanished and he saw outside the leaves, the sky, and the sun that had produced the beam.  The first observation was him looking at  the beam, while the second observation was him looking along  the beam. One gives an outside account, while the other gives the inside participatory account. Other examples he gave are the person falling in love vs. a scientist measuring the physical reactions of the lover, o...
 ...Spell Trappings, Part 2 This post is the conclusion of Spell Trappings, which was published just before this. Prerequisite A spell that requires another spell or Clearance Level to learn qualifies for the trapping of Prerequisite, The difficulty of obtaining the prerequisite determines the degree of Difficulty Number reduction. Restriction Most spells can be cast over and over. When one Fireball  ends, another can begin. Spells that place limits on how often they can be cast qualify for the Restriction trapping. A Restriction's value in reducing the Difficulty Number is based on the amount of time that must pass between castings. Self In the original Torg, there was a trapping for Touch. In that version, an unarmed combat  or similar test needed to be made to transfer the spell effect to the target. Torg Eternity 's Aysle Sourcebook specifies that Touch spells do not actually need to touch the target; merely being close enough to touch the target is good enough. So in...