Skip to main content

 ...The Argument for God from Psychophysical Harmony

(Part 1 of many)

Since I'm limiting myself to chunks of text between 500 and about 1,000 words, I know the full explanation of this argument will take a while. So I will try to take things one piece at a time until it is complete.

Statement of the Claim

The fact that our psychological (mental) experiences are harmonious with physical reality provides strong corroboration for the existence of a God of the type normally associated with Christianity.

Structure of the Argument

The argument compares a priori epistemic probabilities in a Bayesian structure in terms of how likely theism and atheism a priori (i.e, before experiments) would have predicted the result of the experiment on an epistemic basis. All the italicized terms will eventually be defined, either in this post or some later one. Then the Bayesian model of revising epistemic probabilities can be applied to see which option (atheism or theism) is more probable and by approximately how much.

If you believe that one side or the other is absolutely certain, no amount of Bayesian manipulation can alter that. But that means you are convinced that the other side is absolutely impossible, But to know that, you would either need to be able to show deductively that such is impossible or would have to know absolutely everything that can possibly be known. And considering that theism is the belief that there is at least one such being exists, it would make you a god, and therefore a theist.

Possibility and Impossibility

There are three types of possibility (and therefore the same three types of impossibility). The first is logical possibility, which deals with whether something violates a law of logic. "This car is both black and not-black" is a logical impossibility, because it violates the law of non-contradiction. "The moon is made of green cheese" is logically possible, even though it is false, because there is no law of logic violated by that statement. Statements that are logically possible have a definite truth value (they are either true or false), but we may not know what that value is.

The second is epistemic possibility. An epistemic possibility is something that could be true "for all we know". If we don't know, we can theoretically assign a credence value based on our own intuition of how likely (expressed as a number between 0 and 1, with 0 meaning no credence and 1 being complete credence) the statement is to be true. 

The third idea is metaphysical possibility. A metaphysical possibility is often associated with things that can legitimately take different values at different times, like the flip of a coin or the roll of a die. Such an event might be predictable if you know every variable involved (the position of the coin or die before the toss, the force and direction of the vector tossed, height above the surface, etc.), but no one has all that information. For this argument, we will not deal with metaphysical possibilities. We will focus on epistemic possibilities (and probabilities) but the arguments apply just as well if we are talking about the probability of a logical possibility being true. 

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

...My First Parable Two men were walking through a deep forest in search of the large city they had heard was nearby. At a fork in the path, they spotted an ancient signpost with one end pointing toward each path.   The first man noted the age of the signpost, the conflicting pointers, and the obvious attempts that had been made to either fix it or attach other messages onto it. Disgusted, he continued in the path that continued mostly in the direction he was already traveling. The second man thought to himself: "Clearly this signpost was put here for a reason."  He examined the post in depth, not looking for imperfections in it like the first man did, but for what information he could still get from it. He saw that the writing on it was faded but still readable with some effort. And the path to the large city was not the one the first man took, but the other one that required a sharp turn in the direction of travel. So, looking to get out of the forest while there was st...
Post a Comment
Read more
...One small investment for me... One of the things about writing is that things need to be comfortable. Another is that it should be practical to the situation. at hand. So as I'm concerned, a small investment is likely to yield large results. What is this small investment, and why does it matter? The investment is a wireless combo keyboard and mouse. I've had wireless keyboards before, and wireless mouse technology, but the advantage of this is both work with the same USB plug. With only two USB ports in my current computer, that's a major improvement.  This means I am able (if I wish) to operate keyboard, mouse, and something else. The "something else' is always something rare, but when needed, it's great to have. Also, with both keyboard and mouse combined and wireless, it means I do not have to keep the actual laptop near me to type. This means I can keep the laptop at eye level while typing and moving the mouse at a lower level where my hands are effectiv...
Post a Comment
Read more
...Spell Trappings, Part 1 In a previous article, I mentioned that spells can have trappings , additional conditions that can reduce the Difficulty Number of a designed spell. Each trapping must create a situation where the spell either cannot be cast, provides incentive against casting, limits the scope of the spell, or requires additional preparation to cast.  This will list the trappings I have identified so far. Most of these are from the Aysle Sourcebook and reprinted in  Pixaud's Practical Grimoire  from the original Torg, but new ones are added, and all of them will offer suggestions for the player and game master to adjudicate them. In most cases, the value of the trapping has yet to be determined; I am "redesigning" the current published spells to see what values make sense. Additional Cast Time This one is easy enough to understand. Most spells can be cast in a single action, which is one round except in the case of Flurry. So if the spell takes longer than...
Post a Comment
Read more